More on reviewing.
This commit is contained in:
parent
7747928e05
commit
40ac4359ab
|
@ -3,22 +3,28 @@
|
||||||
!!! attention
|
!!! attention
|
||||||
* Paper reviews are for students in time zones who **cannot** attend live
|
* Paper reviews are for students in time zones who **cannot** attend live
|
||||||
lectures.
|
lectures.
|
||||||
* Students who are able to attend live lectures should complete a paper
|
* Students who are able to attend live lectures are required to complete a
|
||||||
presentation and presentation summary instead.
|
paper presentation and presentation summary instead.
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
Students who cannot attend live lectures will complete **one paper review per
|
Starting from the first week of paper presentations (**September 14**), students
|
||||||
week** (10 in all). We will be using HotCRP---standard conference management
|
who cannot attend live lectures will complete **two paper reviews per week**,
|
||||||
software---to manage review uploads and discussions. Reviews must be uploaded
|
**16** in all. We will be using HotCRP---standard conference management
|
||||||
**before the paper is presented in class**.
|
software---to manage reviews. Reviews must be uploaded **before the paper is
|
||||||
|
presented in class**.
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
|
The HotCRP instance for this course is available here:
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
|
- <https://wisc-cs763-20.hotcrp.com/>
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
## What makes a good review?
|
## What makes a good review?
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
A good review accomplishes several things:
|
A good review accomplishes several things:
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
- It **summarizes** the main contributions of the paper.
|
- It **summarizes** the main contributions of the paper.
|
||||||
- It highlights **strengths and weaknesses** of the paper.
|
- It highlights **strengths and weaknesses** of the paper. Note that these
|
||||||
|
points do not need to be purely technical.
|
||||||
- It **evaluates** the paper, explaining why the reviewer thinks the paper is
|
- It **evaluates** the paper, explaining why the reviewer thinks the paper is
|
||||||
strong or weak.
|
strong or weak, interesting or not interesting.
|
||||||
- It gives authors **suggestions to improve** the paper.
|
- It gives authors **suggestions to improve** the paper.
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
## FAQ
|
## FAQ
|
||||||
|
@ -26,12 +32,37 @@ A good review accomplishes several things:
|
||||||
- **Can I switch from doing paper presentation/summary to paper reviews or vice versa?**
|
- **Can I switch from doing paper presentation/summary to paper reviews or vice versa?**
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
No: if you are doing paper reviews, you must let me know on the first week of
|
No: if you are doing paper reviews, you must let me know on the first week of
|
||||||
class.
|
class so that I can add you as a reviewer to HotCRP.
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
|
- **How long should reviews be?**
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
|
You should aim for around 400 words, total. We will not be counting words, but
|
||||||
|
if your review is three sentences long we will probably not be too happy.
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
- **Are late reviews accepted?**
|
- **Are late reviews accepted?**
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
No: reviews must be uploaded before the paper is presented in class.
|
No: reviews must be uploaded before the paper is presented in class.
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
- **Can I submit more than one review a week?**
|
- **Can I submit more than two reviews a week?**
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
No: should submit exactly one review per week.
|
No: should submit exactly two reviews per week.
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
|
- **I was not sure how to evaluate the paper: what should I do?**
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
|
You should say so, and explain the strengths and weaknesses of the paper.
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
|
- **It takes me too much time to read through two papers. What should I do?**
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
|
Given the short reviewing schedule, you will not have time to read through every
|
||||||
|
single word in every single paper. Instead, you should skim over parts that are
|
||||||
|
not so crucial. More concretely, you should do the first **two passes** of the
|
||||||
|
three-pass system described
|
||||||
|
[here](http://ccr.sigcomm.org/online/files/p83-keshavA.pdf)---the third pass is
|
||||||
|
**not** required.
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
|
- **I found a review of the paper online. Can I look at it for inspiration?**
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
|
Definitely not: doing so is an academic honesty violation. Anyways, there is
|
||||||
|
absolutely right or wrong conclusion when reviewing a paper---the idea is to
|
||||||
|
give **your opinion** of the paper based on **your understanding**, and then
|
||||||
|
argue why your opinion is correct.
|
||||||
|
|
|
@ -52,16 +52,16 @@ Grades will be posted on Canvas.
|
||||||
- Milestone 2: **10%**
|
- Milestone 2: **10%**
|
||||||
- Final project: **50%**
|
- Final project: **50%**
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
Everything except the final project will be graded on a simple **3-point**
|
Everything except the final project will be graded on a simple scale: no
|
||||||
scale: below expectations, meets expectations, or exceeds expectations. The
|
submission, below expectations, meets expectations, or exceeds expectations. The
|
||||||
final project will be graded on a **10-point** scale.
|
final project will be graded on a **10-point** scale.
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
## Academic Honesty
|
## Academic Honesty
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
**Writing is a central part of this course.** All students are expected to
|
**Writing is a central part of this course.** All students are expected to
|
||||||
follow academic honesty standards. In brief: all the text that you submit must
|
follow academic honesty standards. In brief: all the text that you submit must
|
||||||
be **in your own words**, and you are not allowed to copy anything (from a
|
be **in your own words**, and you are not allowed to copy anything---from a
|
||||||
paper, or from someone else) without full attribution.
|
paper, or from someone else---without full attribution.
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
If you are completing paper reviews, you should not search for reviews that may
|
If you are completing paper reviews, you should not search for reviews that may
|
||||||
be online---this is expressly **against the course policies**. You should
|
be online---this is expressly **against the course policies**. You should
|
||||||
|
@ -69,7 +69,7 @@ complete the review as if you were seeing the paper for the first time.
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
## Piazza
|
## Piazza
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
We will be using Piazza to discuss papers, ask questions, and find group
|
We will be using **Piazza** to discuss papers, ask questions, and find group
|
||||||
members:
|
members:
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
- <https://piazza.com/class/ke3clkclul16hq>
|
- <https://piazza.com/class/ke3clkclul16hq>
|
||||||
|
@ -77,6 +77,16 @@ members:
|
||||||
You can also contact me directly. To ensure that your email goes to the right
|
You can also contact me directly. To ensure that your email goes to the right
|
||||||
place, please start the subject with **CS763**.
|
place, please start the subject with **CS763**.
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
|
## HotCRP
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
|
If you are not able to attend live lectures and you are completing paper
|
||||||
|
reviews, we will be using **HotCRP** to organize paper reviews. HotCRP is the
|
||||||
|
software used to manage most conferences in computer science. Through this site,
|
||||||
|
you will be able to submit reviews. We have set up a mock HotCRP for this
|
||||||
|
course:
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
|
- <https://wisc-cs763-20.hotcrp.com/>
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
## Course Staff
|
## Course Staff
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
- **Instructor**: [Justin Hsu](https://justinh.su)
|
- **Instructor**: [Justin Hsu](https://justinh.su)
|
||||||
|
|
Reference in New Issue